2018 Year In Review

Uncategorized

Accounts Receivable Management (ARM)

2018 was a strong year for the ARM industry, both in terms of placement and liquidation performance, and M&A deal activity.

Throughout 2018, collection agencies, collection law firms and debt buyers shared positive news in terms of increased business in most market segments, particularly financial services. In fact, our discussions with several leading credit issuers in the financial services market have indicated that, due to rising delinquency and charged-off volumes, they are in process of expanding their agency and legal networks and preparing for increased portfolio sale activity. We haven’t had these types of discussions with financial institutions for over 10 years! Based on this feedback, we anticipate the upcoming RMA conference to be well attended and highly active.

In terms of deal activity, the ARM industry generated 30 transactions valued in aggregate at just over $3.4 billion in deal value. While 2018 M&A activity was down compared to 2017, it still produced strong results. CAS recognized its strongest year yet, completing six transactions. Interest in acquiring collection agencies and debt buyers continued in 2018, driven by improved financial performance and business trends. We expect this trend to continue in 2019.

2018 was a continuation of 2017’s robust market trends, driven by improved macro-economic conditions (e.g., increased consumer spending), a more business friendly stance from the Trump administration and regulatory authorities including the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (BCFP). However, several market analysts in the second half of 2018 began to indicate concerns regarding a market correction due to the level of outstanding consumer debt coupled with overinflated valuations in the public market indices. These concerns seemed to be validated based on the change in market performance during Q4 of 2018. According to the Federal Reserve’s Consumer Credit G.19 Report (released in January 2019), total consumer credit outstanding (not seasonally adjusted) has increased from just north of $3.3 trillion to just under $4 trillion (not including mortgage debt) in the past five years. At about $1.5 trillion, student loans represent almost half this amount. Credit card debt is hovering around $1 trillion. These amounts exceed the pre-Great Recession levels and are causing certain analysts and bear market forecasters concern regarding the United States’ economic stability. However, other trends are not pointing toward a significant downturn, indicating a correction is in order but not a serious or long-term recession. Therefore, we anticipate placement volumes to continue to increase in 2019, while liquidation rates stabilize and possibly drop slightly toward the second half of the year.  An additional turning point has been the prevailing job market and unemployment rate nationwide. The national unemployment rate reached a 50 year low during Q3 at 3.7% but finished off 2018 at 3.9%. While ending on a slight increase, this is still the lowest year end unemployment rate in the past decade.

One upcoming announcement that the ARM industry is highly anticipating, which may impact 2019 performance, is the BCFP’s delivery of its proposed rules by the end of Q1. The ARM industry has been waiting for these rules since the creation of the BCFP and hopes for clarity on how they can communicate with consumers in a compliant manner. Stay tuned.

Other notable trends for 2019 include a continued focus on non-voice interaction solutions with consumers, and the never-ending roller coaster ride that has become the Department of Education contract. The small business contractors are enjoying their status and financial performance, while the large business contractors are still fighting to secure their rights to participate as well. We will see what happens over the next several months. Also, the U.S. government is still planning to pay out tax returns regardless of the current government shutdown. Due to the uncertainty of the situation, there is speculation surrounding when these returns will be processed, and when funds made available to filers. If tax returns are delayed the ARM industry may experience a delay in their seasonal performance.

Links to articles with additional details on these subjects are provided at the end of this section.

ARM trends we are watching in 2019

Notable 2018 ARM Transactions 

Revenue Cycle Management (RCM)

In 2018, the Healthcare RCM services market generated 39 transactions representing just north of $2.4 billion in deal value.

Deals are being driven by overall market growth, attractive financial performance and a healthy forecast for outsourced Healthcare RCM services – Healthcare Revenue Cycle Management Market is expected to surge at 11.8% CAGR up to 2024.

As the Healthcare market continues to grow, we are seeing a greater percentage of healthcare provider revenue coming from patients. Patient out-of-pocket costs (particularly those with private insurance plans) have increased due to changes to insurance plans most notably increased deductibles. Additionally, hospitals face renewed pressure to improve their quality of care and operate more efficiently. This is forcing hospitals to focus more on capturing transactional cost synergies and achieving operational efficiencies, motivating them to further seek out automated and outsourced business solutions that better meet their needs.

Firms are beginning to unlock the true value of data to improve collection rates and overall customer experience. Proactively gathering information during the scheduling, preregistration, and registration processes must be a complete and accurate process which should include checking medical necessity for outpatient services and providing estimates of cost and patient liability. Verifying insurance and checking for prior authorizations will prevent disruptions to the billing process and more importantly, care. It is key that patient access controls are meticulous to limit the risk of billing mistakes, lost revenue, and poor patient and physician satisfaction. This entire process has started to become an outsourced solution for certain healthcare providers, while others are trying to streamline the process utilizing integrated technology and more efficient operational solutions. 

There are still complex claims that require human intervention. To best handle those, a specialized team that knows their payer will allow faster and more accurate work. Technology will be able to direct such issues to the proper department, or outsourced vendor, who specializes in that type of claim.

Many owners believe adopting a platform-based business model and collaborating with digital partners is crucial for future success. As artificial intelligence makes its way into the Healthcare RCM industry, 48% of executives use IT to automate tasks, 70% report more investments in embedded artificial intelligence (AI) and 69% in machine learning. 

39% of healthcare executives believe investing in a platform-based business models and partnering with digital companies is crucial for the success of their business. Growth for health application-programming interfaces (APIs) is expected to grow 10x in the next 5 years.

According to Jeff Hurst of Cerner, “Leveraging AI, healthcare technology will be positioned to further the work to reduce the cost to collect in registration, scheduling, charge capture, health information management and billing and collections”. Estimation tools that give patients an idea of what their out of pocket expenses will be provides transparency to the consumer and increases collectability. 

RCM trends we are watching in 2019

  • The nature of RCM is rather repetitive making it a good candidate for Robotic Process Automation (RPA). A robot can process claims and enter data faster, more efficiently and with less chance of error than a human all at a lower cost. Significant investments and upkeep is required to adapt such a business model; however, it is far less than human.
  • Increases in denials and actual write-offs from insurance companies are anticipated in 2019. Denial rates have come down over the past few years but the battle between payers and providers has heated up again as they fight for reimburse dollars. As artificial intelligence is integrated, errors in data entry are expected to fall and the revenue cycle is expected to shorten in length. This is due to its ability to identify patterns and make decisions with minimal human interaction. 
  • As revenue cycle leaders are continuing to look for ways to improve performance, it will require courageous steps in switching over to a data-driven highly autonomous revenue cycle. Disruption in the industry will allow health systems to free up human capital and allow them to focus on patient integration by putting customer service and patient treatment at the forefront of healthcare revenue management. 

Notable 2018 Healthcare RCM Transactions

Customer Relationship Management (CRM)

2018 was another active year for the CRM industry, generating
23 transactions that totaled more than $4.8 billion in deal value.  

Outsourced call center companies have received increased interest over the past year, predominantly from strategic buyers that seek to improve financial performance through the implementation of operational efficiencies and synergistic cost savings. Implementing a near-shore/offshore model is one area of great interest, but also utilizing improved technology solutions to provide an enhanced client experience at a more affordable cost seems to be the driving force in today’s market.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) continues to develop into a mandatory tool for businesses to assist in workflow processing. Based on a report by Deloitte, 57% of their respondents currently utilize some sort of AI solutions with 37% planning to integrate it within the next two years. Hardware manufacturers such as Nvidia have already began creating devices strictly designed to process and develop the most efficient AI possible. These signal a continued forward push for AI solutions. We predict that these solutions will continue to impact the job market, especially in contact centers where automation is starting to build a significant foundation. 

Data integration and software solutions are becoming a heightened priority for contact centers to improve operating efficiency. As cloud-based contact centers become more visible in the market, maintaining secure consumer data is a key compliance component. A recent study by Vanson Bourne estimated that businesses within the US and UK lose over $140 billion year over year due to miscalculated data investments. To thrive within the space, CAS believes contact centers must develop a strict plan of action on how to optimize their data integration. By doing so this can lead to a reduction in expenses and greater margins for the future.

Customer experience continues to be at the forefront of priorities for call centers in retaining clients and generating revenue. Contact centers are consistently struggling to retain clients solely from product quality and price as the market continues to develop. The customer experience management market is expected to reach $1.5 billion in 2023 growing at a CAGR of 16%. In addition, the increased popularity of social media platforms has created numerous different verticals for call centers to interact with consumers. A recent study indicates that phone calls are expected to consist of 47% of call center interactions in 2019, down from 64% in 2018. CAS predicts call centers will continue to put emphasis on omnichannel communications as multiple sources of customer engagement become more reliable. 

Chatbots are now an increasingly valuable tool for supplementing customer engagement within call centers globally. A report by Gartner states that by 2020 more than 85% of questions will be handled by chatbots and AI in comparison to the 70% that is today. On the contrary, research by NewVoiceMedia suggests that 75% of consumers prefer live agents over self-service options or chatbots when interacting with contact centers. This may create tension regarding the most efficient platform for call centers to preform collections on.

CRM trends we are watching in 2019

  • The cloud-based contact center model continues to be the desirable route for many companies across the globe. The cloud market is expected to reach $24.11 billion by 2023 and grow at a CAGR of 25% from now onward. CAS expects much of the industry to transition to the cloud to streamline workflows. 
  • The Philippines is continuing to give tough competition to India as the most desired call center outsourcing location. Tax incentives, lower employment costs, and better English skills are driving servicers to shift their focus towards the region. In 2018, the Philippines GDP was expected to rise by 7.5%. CAS believes this is a trend worth watching as the BPO market begins to diversify its locations. 
  • CAS believes that call centers will continually become more technology focused to meet the increasing demands of the market. Interactive Voice Response (IVR) and Omnichannel communication techniques allow servicers to work with increased efficiency and route caller’s simple requests. This increased emphasis on AI and evolving technology indicates call centers will continue to make software investments in the future.  

Notable 2018 CRM Transactions

Specialty Finance

We are beginning to witness a fundamental shift in the way people are accessing, depositing, investing and processing funds. Consumer behavior and demographics are shifting, which is creating a need for adaption within the OBS market. 

Specialty Finance, which is a relatively young segment of the market, is acting as a disrupter for change by solving issues through the development of consumer-centric, data-driven, fully-integrated technology enhanced solutions. The increased popularity of e-commerce and technology literacy is pushing consumers away from traditional behaviors and toward those solutions that seamlessly integrate into their daily lives. OBS companies are increasingly forced to augment their traditional processes with technology and analytical solutions to remain competitive and relevant in the marketplace. Financial investors and strategic industry participants continue to stress high levels of interest in acquiring into, partnering with, or increasing end-market exposure to the Specialty Finance industry.

Companies are introducing new mediums for payment in response to customer demand and the rise of consumerism. People want to be able to pay their bills with the same ease as they can with their favorite retailer. The introduction of mobile and text payment options should yield substantial savings and better customer experience. The CVS-Aetna deal is an example of this and should make health care available to these consumers over the phone, at a retail clinic or via an app.

65% of consumers pay their bill on the first text sent out and 80% of people who are given the option, use it. Mobile devices and the internet are the center of communication and commerce today. A well-timed call or letter used to be the premier method to get in contact with someone, but today’s generations are best reached via their smart phone which has email, internet and a pleather of apps. Given that mobile devices are the preferred communication method and way to pay bills, banks and health systems must provide the same type of experience and convenience to consumers that they love at their favorite retailer. 

New technology that handles highly sensitive personal and financial information comes with risk and exposure to data breaches. Millennials have expressed that they are willing to sacrifice privacy or give personal information in exchange for convenience. We expect to see investment in security alongside new payment methods leading to heightened M&A, especially companies looking to purchase platform companies. It is best practice to collect data on customers yourself, because according to Deloitte, 71% of purchased data is inaccurate. This gold mine must be protected as government regulation applies pressure to keep personal information secure.  

Peer to Peer lending (P2P) continues to grow at rapid rates; especially in foreign countries where access to capital is not quite as easy as it is in the US. Brazil’s central Bank authorized peer-to-peer lending in attempt to increase competition and lower the country’s notoriously high interest rates. Laying out clear rules leaves investors feeling safer and confident in the industry. On the flip side, P2P has grown enormously in China, but regulation is heading in the opposite direction. As the nation intensifies a crackdown on riskier forms of financing, the market could shrink by as much as 70% in China.

Specialty Finance trends we are watching in 2019

ARM REGULATORY RESOURCE

Elaine Rowley  | Corporate Advisory Solutions, LLC
Chevy Chase, Maryland
240-235-6008

Bobby Petner, CAS Intern, contributor
Philadelphia, PA

The ARM Regulatory Resource is the CAS quarterly Newsletter feature focused on government news, regulation and compliance so you are informed of the latest activities of government agencies with the most oversight over the ARM sector.  Your comments and suggestions are welcome!

Letters: To Send or Not to Send

Nick Jarman, Owner, RIGHT AWAY LLC

To send or not to send, when it comes to letters in today’s hyper sensitive climate that is thy question.  In our industry there have always been two conflicting views, just as Republicans stand up for their beliefs so do Democrats for theirs, there are those who view letters as a revenue source while others view letters as a revenue drain.  So, what is the answer, who is right and who is wrong?  The answer lies somewhere in the middle.  In the middle of perception, expectation, and necessity.

Let’s talk about the perception of letters, notably the initial dunning letter which would be the first letter sent on an account.  How do you, the reader of this article perceive letters.  There is a good chance how you perceive the receiving of letters to how you feel about their place in the credit and collection industry.  If you are a person that opens each piece of mail and reviews it contents, then your perception of letters would be positive.  There are those individuals who find themselves somewhere in the middle, maybe they open some of the mail, letters that include colored copies or perforated edges as those may indicate very important information.  Finally, some individual finds themselves on the opposite end of the spectrum and discard letters as they receive them without every opening them, maybe because they have signed up to receive electronic statements from their creditors or event text message reminders.  So, in order to determine the success and/or failure of a letter strategy in your organization there must be a fundamental belief in how those at decision makers perceive it.

Next up is an understanding of expectations.  If you decide to send letters, as an organization it is very important to be goal oriented with expectations in mind.  Some of those expectations should be the amount of mail that will go unreturned, the amount of call backs generated, from the call backs being generated how many were right party contacts, and lastly what was the revenue generated from the letters and was it a profitable venture.  In order to account for the number of calls backs generated by letters an organization needs to adopt a dedicated phone number that is only listed on letters with the systemic ability to generate reporting in order to review the metrics and where if the expectations were met or not.  For those who decide against sending non-required letters, asking what the expectations are is on the table as well.  Just as those who sent letters generated right party contacts and revenue that traditional cold calling wouldn’t, what revenue and production are they potentially losing out on.

One of, it not the most major considerations into a letter strategy is the requirement under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act that requires a letter be sent to a consumer within five days after the initial communication (exact reading of this statute at the end of this article.)  So, with this requirement in place under the FDCPA which a strict-liability statute is (meaning anything short of perfection is a violation) those in the third-party collection space.  There are several methods in attacking the letter strategy and stay in compliance.  One is to send letters out upon placement of account within the office, which is for those of course with the perception of letters being well minded.  Second, instead of sending letters out upon placement on every account, the accounts can be scored and segmented and letters can be sent on those accounts.  Some even do the opposite and send letters and the lower scored and segmented accounts while minimizing human action on those accounts.  One other way to handle sending letters and stay in compliance is to set a systemic procedure in place that evaluates accounts each day and automatically sends the notice of intent to deposit letters only on accounts that have had a right party contact.

For those who perceive letters in a positive light, has set clear expectations on objectives and goals, and following the necessary requirements under the FDCPA then sending additional letters would be in the cards.  Industry best practices for sending letters ranges from one to three letters for accounts that an agency may maintain for six months on average.  It is smart to alternate how the letters are sent; maybe the first one is sent like a traditional letter, while the second is written on pink paper, and third could be a perforated letter with the hopes of getting the consumer to open the letter and achieve the ultimate goal, for them to take action and repay the debt being collected upon.

Below is the context of the letters directly from the FDCPA:

Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, which is a strict liability statute (which means perfection and 100% compliance) is the expectation it states that within five days after the initial communication with a consumer in connection with the collection of any debt, a debt collector shall, unless the following information is contained in the initial communication or the consumer has paid the debt, send the consumer a written notice containing:

  1. the amount of the debt;
  2. the name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed;
  3. a statement that unless the consumer, within thirty days after receipt of the notice, disputes the validity of the debt, or any portion thereof, the debt will be assumed to be valid by the debt collector;
  4. a statement that if the consumer notifies the debt collector in writing within the thirty-day period that the debt, or any portion thereof, is disputed, the debt collector will obtain verification of the debt or a copy of a judgment against the consumer and a copy of such verification or judgment will be mailed to the consumer by the debt collector; and
  5. a statement that, upon the consumer’s written request within the thirty-day period, the debt collector will provide the consumer with the name and address of the original creditor, if different from the current creditor.

Nick Jarman has two decades of experience encompassing all facets of the accounts receivables industry including performance, compliance, business development, training, IT, analytics, and client experience. He served the last three years on the Board of Directors for ACA International and is the past President of the MCA. He is adamant about leading by example and ensuring that every process is done the “right way.”

To get in touch call 636-233-9779

Seven Mistakes that Prevent Companies from Hiring the Best Available Talent

John F. Fiumano, CEO, Executive Alliance

We hope this article will help you to avoid some of the mistakes that inhibit you from hiring the best talent in the industry.

1. Failing to prepare candidates

Do not treat the initial interview as a blind date!

Candidates interested in preparing themselves for an interview are more likely to utilize the tools available to them on the job. In fact, a lack of interest on the candidate’s behalf can be seen as a red flag for hiring. Below are items we encourage our candidates to research prior to interviewing for a potential opening:

  • The company’s products, industries and services
  • Problems or challenges that the team might be facing
  • Industry issues that the company might be facing
  • Articles, web pages and other media sources
  • Historical information on the company’s growth
  • Financial and profitability data (if available)

2. Treat the interview as an open book test

If candidates do not take advantage of the resources available, you’ve learned something. If they do take the time and initiative to research a potential employer, then you can expect to have more insight into what they will have to offer as a part of your team.

3. Failure to leverage the interview into other useful contacts

Sure, Human Resources asks each candidate to recommend and refer his or her professional associates for other opportunities. We find it much more productive to have the hiring manager do this! Potential candidates are more compelled to tell their potential boss whom they know in the industry. Once you have some referrals, start to develop a network and invite these potential employees to a company outing or other networking forum. This is a great way to identify potential new hires before critical needs arise.

4. Too much “Question – Answer”

Every interview should have a component that takes the candidate out of the “ask – respond” interview.

Many poor hiring choices are made because the candidate interviews well but, once hired, does not mesh well with team members or the company culture. Take the candidate to the company cafeteria or on the center floor and observe their interaction with the other employees and potential peers. This will often help you to avoid hiring candidates that are a bad fit. Additionally, peers often provide valuable insight into a potential hire’s skill set.

5. Inadequate reference checks

Too many companies do an inadequate job of checking references, often delegating the task to Human Resources. We suggest that the hiring manager make these phone calls! Again this is an excellent opportunity to network. Peers tend to be blunter and more open with one another. There are legal issues here and they should be addressed with the hiring manager before the phone calls take place. One question we love is “If you had the opportunity to hire this person back to your team, would you?” While the answer matters, it’s the hesitation or enthusiasm in answering the question that is critical.

6. Unreasonably long decision process

Companies should set a specific time frame for the decision process. Candidates are less likely to accept an offer when made to wait an excessive period of time. Companies can develop a poor reputation by treating the hiring process indecisively and candidates disrespectfully.

7. Unusually long offer process

If your company does not have a standard streamlined offer process, create it!

Candidates see a long offer process as a red flag when looking to join a company. They may begin to doubt that the offer will happen and begin to reconsider other offers. Candidates being hired into management positions also see this as hindering to their own ability to perform. “What will happen when I have to bring somebody on board that I need desperately?” And again your company’s reputation is at risk here.

If your company is making any of these mistakes, eliminate one blunder at a time and enjoy the pay off as you move on to improve the quality of your team.

John F. Fiumano is  CEO of Executive Alliance, one of the premier executive search firms in the country focused on the financial services, credit and collections industries. 

To get in touch call 813-973-2200 (ext. 300) or e-mail John at
[email protected]

Related Posts

Menu